Home/Case Law/MICHAEL GARCIA vs. CTEC, INC.; CIGA FOR INDUSTRIAL INDEMITY/FREMONT; COVER-TECH, INC.; WANTZ EQUIPMENT CO.; STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND; GERLAD WALBURG; STATE FARM; ARCO AM/PM; ZENITH INSURANCE CO.
Regular DecisionPetition for Disqualification

MICHAEL GARCIA vs. CTEC, INC.; CIGA FOR INDUSTRIAL INDEMITY/FREMONT; COVER-TECH, INC.; WANTZ EQUIPMENT CO.; STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND; GERLAD WALBURG; STATE FARM; ARCO AM/PM; ZENITH INSURANCE CO.

Filed: Mar 13, 2025
Sacramento
ADJ3006563; ADJ2512405; ADJ7197475; ADJ15625557; ADJ1164291; ADJ862254; ADJ2541408; ADJ1046449; ADJ3981124; ADJ3034703; ADJ18423850

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied Michael Garcia's Petition for Disqualification, adopting the report of Workers' Compensation Administrative Law Judge (WCJ) Noah W. Tempkin. The petition sought to disqualify WCJ Tempkin, alleging bias and fraud. The WCAB found that Mr. Garcia failed to present specific facts to support his disqualification claim under Code of Civil Procedure section 641. Additionally, the petition was found to contain numerous impermissible attachments, which were subsequently removed. The WCAB admonished the applicant to adhere to its rules in future filings.

MICHAEL GARCIA vs. CTEC, INC.; CIGA FOR INDUSTRIAL INDEMITY/FREMONT; COVER-TECH, INC.; WANTZ EQUIPMENT CO.; STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND; GERLAD WALBURG; STATE FARM; ARCO AM/PM; ZENITH INSURANCE CO. is a workers' compensation case decided in Sacramento. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Sacramento.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied Michael Garcia's Petition for Disqualification, adopting the report of Workers' Compensation Administrative Law Judge (WCJ) Noah W. Tempkin. The petition sought to disqualify WCJ Tempkin, alleging bias and fraud. The WCAB found that Mr. Garcia failed to present specific facts to support his disqualification claim under Code of Civil Procedure section 641. Additionally, the petition was found to contain numerous impermissible attachments, which were subsequently removed. The WCAB admonished the applicant to adhere to its rules in future filings.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

MICHAEL GARCIA vs. CTEC, INC.; CIGA FOR INDUSTRIAL INDEMITY/FREMONT; COVER-TECH, INC.; WANTZ EQUIPMENT CO.; STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND; GERLAD WALBURG; STATE FARM; ARCO AM/PM; ZENITH INSURANCE CO. workers compensation case in Sacramento. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

MICHAEL GARCIA vs. CTEC, INC.; CIGA FOR INDUSTRIAL INDEMITY/FREMONT; COVER-TECH, INC.; WANTZ EQUIPMENT CO.; STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND; GERLAD WALBURG; STATE FARM; ARCO AM/PM; ZENITH INSURANCE CO. case law summary from Sacramento. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

MICHAEL GARCIA vs. CTEC, INC.; CIGA FOR INDUSTRIAL INDEMITY/FREMONT; COVER-TECH, INC.; WANTZ EQUIPMENT CO.; STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND; GERLAD WALBURG; STATE FARM; ARCO AM/PM; ZENITH INSURANCE CO. Case Analysis

MICHAEL GARCIA vs. CTEC, INC.; CIGA FOR INDUSTRIAL INDEMITY/FREMONT; COVER-TECH, INC.; WANTZ EQUIPMENT CO.; STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND; GERLAD WALBURG; STATE FARM; ARCO AM/PM; ZENITH INSURANCE CO. is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Sacramento. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.