CompFox AI Summary
This case involves applicant Michael Danks' petition to limit the scope of a workers' compensation trial, arguing only discovery and transportation expenses should be litigated. The Appeals Board denied the petition, upholding the WCJ's decision to allow trial on all issues. The Board recommended the WCJ consider applicant's financial hardship, potentially allowing telephone appearance and coordinating medical evaluations to minimize travel costs. It also noted that Almaraz-Guzman analysis is optional and other issues may be decided even if permanent disability isn't resolved.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case involves applicant Michael Danks' petition to limit the scope of a workers' compensation trial, arguing only discovery and transportation expenses should be litigated. The Appeals Board denied the petition, upholding the WCJ's decision to allow trial on all issues. The Board recommended the WCJ consider applicant's financial hardship, potentially allowing telephone appearance and coordinating medical evaluations to minimize travel costs. It also noted that Almaraz-Guzman analysis is optional and other issues may be decided even if permanent disability isn't resolved.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.