CompFox AI Summary
This case involves a fire captain claiming a cumulative trauma skin cancer injury. The defendant employer contests the $39%$ permanent disability award, arguing the AMA Guides were misapplied and the rating inequitably reflects the applicant's functional ability. The employer also challenges the WCJ's refusal to apportion prior disability and the finding of an "insidious disease" for ongoing jurisdiction. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration to allow the defendant to argue the AMA Guides rating is an inaccurate measure of disability under Almaraz/Guzman. The matter is returned to the trial level for further proceedings, with the WCJ to address the apportionment and insidious disease issues in a new decision.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case involves a fire captain claiming a cumulative trauma skin cancer injury. The defendant employer contests the $39%$ permanent disability award, arguing the AMA Guides were misapplied and the rating inequitably reflects the applicant's functional ability. The employer also challenges the WCJ's refusal to apportion prior disability and the finding of an "insidious disease" for ongoing jurisdiction. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration to allow the defendant to argue the AMA Guides rating is an inaccurate measure of disability under Almaraz/Guzman. The matter is returned to the trial level for further proceedings, with the WCJ to address the apportionment and insidious disease issues in a new decision.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.