Home/Case Law/Melissa Suzanne Dew v. ProTemp
Regular Panel Decision DecisionRegular Panel Decision

Melissa Suzanne Dew v. ProTemp

Filed: Jan 05, 2001
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
E2000-01750-COA-R3-CV

CompFox AI Summary

This case concerns Melissa Suzanne Dew's appeal against Pro-Temp, a temporary employment agency, following a grant of summary judgment in a retaliatory discharge claim. Dew alleged that Pro-Temp terminated her employment in retaliation for asserting worker's compensation rights after a work-related finger injury. The Trial Court ruled that Dew failed to establish that Pro-Temp terminated her employment or that there was a causal connection between her worker's compensation claim and her removal from an assignment at Eagle Bend Manufacturing, Inc. The Court of Appeals affirmed the summary judgment, finding that Pro-Temp successfully negated the essential elements of Dew's claim, including the termination of employment and the causal link, as Dew was offered other assignments and later placed in a permanent position with another company with Pro-Temp's assistance, and Pro-Temp was unaware of her pending surgery at the time of her removal from Eagle Bend.

Melissa Suzanne Dew v. ProTemp is a workers' compensation case decided in Court of Appeals of Tennessee. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Court of Appeals of Tennessee.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case concerns Melissa Suzanne Dew's appeal against Pro-Temp, a temporary employment agency, following a grant of summary judgment in a retaliatory discharge claim. Dew alleged that Pro-Temp terminated her employment in retaliation for asserting worker's compensation rights after a work-related finger injury. The Trial Court ruled that Dew failed to establish that Pro-Temp terminated her employment or that there was a causal connection between her worker's compensation claim and her removal from an assignment at Eagle Bend Manufacturing, Inc. The Court of Appeals affirmed the summary judgment, finding that Pro-Temp successfully negated the essential elements of Dew's claim, including the termination of employment and the causal link, as Dew was offered other assignments and later placed in a permanent position with another company with Pro-Temp's assistance, and Pro-Temp was unaware of her pending surgery at the time of her removal from Eagle Bend.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Melissa Suzanne Dew v. ProTemp workers compensation case in Court of Appeals of Tennessee. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Melissa Suzanne Dew v. ProTemp case law summary from Court of Appeals of Tennessee. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Melissa Suzanne Dew v. ProTemp Case Analysis

Melissa Suzanne Dew v. ProTemp is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Court of Appeals of Tennessee. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.