Home/Case Law/MELINDA PRISKIN vs. BANK OF AMERICA, XL INSURANCE
Regular DecisionRemoval

MELINDA PRISKIN vs. BANK OF AMERICA, XL INSURANCE

Filed: Mar 03, 2020
Los Angeles
ADJ11292320

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the defendant's Petition for Removal, rescinding the WCJ's prior order. The Board found the WCJ erred by proceeding with an expedited hearing on issues that were not ripe for such a hearing, specifically the denial of injury AOE/COE and the presumption of compensability under Labor Code Section 5402. The defendant was denied due process as it did not have an opportunity to present evidence regarding the timeliness of its denial or the personnel defense. The matter was returned to the WCJ for further proceedings, including a proper hearing to develop the evidentiary record.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the defendant's Petition for Removal, rescinding the WCJ's prior order. The Board found the WCJ erred by proceeding with an expedited hearing on issues that were not ripe for such a hearing, specifically the denial of injury AOE/COE and the presumption of compensability under Labor Code Section 5402. The defendant was denied due process as it did not have an opportunity to present evidence regarding the timeliness of its denial or the personnel defense. The matter was returned to the WCJ for further proceedings, including a proper hearing to develop the evidentiary record.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

MELINDA PRISKIN vs. BANK OF AMERICA, XL INSURANCE (2020) – Los Angeles | CompFox