Home/Case Law/MEI.TEM NARTER vs. SAS INSTITUTE, ST. PAUL TRAVELERS
Regular DecisionReconsideration

MEI.TEM NARTER vs. SAS INSTITUTE, ST. PAUL TRAVELERS

Filed: Dec 10, 2007
San Francisco
ANA 388603

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of a decision that disallowed an applicant's attorney a fee for attending a defendant's deposition of a percipient witness. The Board found no statutory authority for such a fee, as Labor Code section 5710 only allows fees for deponents who are the injured employee or their dependent. The Board also rejected arguments to analogize the situation to other fee-granting statutes and clarified that attorney fees are generally not considered recoverable costs.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of a decision that disallowed an applicant's attorney a fee for attending a defendant's deposition of a percipient witness. The Board found no statutory authority for such a fee, as Labor Code section 5710 only allows fees for deponents who are the injured employee or their dependent. The Board also rejected arguments to analogize the situation to other fee-granting statutes and clarified that attorney fees are generally not considered recoverable costs.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

MEI.TEM NARTER vs. SAS INSTITUTE, ST. PAUL TRAVELERS (2007) – San Francisco | CompFox