CompFox AI Summary
Plaintiff Loretha McCullough, a former Xerox employee, brought an action against Xerox alleging unlawful salary disparities based on race and sex under the Equal Pay Act (EPA) and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. McCullough claimed she was paid less than male and/or Caucasian employees in similar positions since 2004. Xerox moved for summary judgment to dismiss the entire complaint. The court granted summary judgment in part, dismissing McCullough's Title VII race and sex-based discrimination claims and her EPA claim related to her participation in the Black Belt Program. However, the court denied summary judgment on McCullough's EPA claims arising from her employment as a Human Resources Manager, allowing these specific claims to proceed.
McCullough v. Xerox Corp. is a workers' compensation case decided in District Court, W.D. New York. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in District Court, W.D. New York.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
Plaintiff Loretha McCullough, a former Xerox employee, brought an action against Xerox alleging unlawful salary disparities based on race and sex under the Equal Pay Act (EPA) and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. McCullough claimed she was paid less than male and/or Caucasian employees in similar positions since 2004. Xerox moved for summary judgment to dismiss the entire complaint. The court granted summary judgment in part, dismissing McCullough's Title VII race and sex-based discrimination claims and her EPA claim related to her participation in the Black Belt Program. However, the court denied summary judgment on McCullough's EPA claims arising from her employment as a Human Resources Manager, allowing these specific claims to proceed.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.