Home/Case Law/McClendon v. Charente Steamship Co.
Regular Panel Decision DecisionMotion for Summary Judgment Decision

McClendon v. Charente Steamship Co.

District Court, S.D. Texas
MISSING

CompFox AI Summary

The plaintiff, a longshoreman, sustained personal injuries in 1959 and received compensation under the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act. After formal awards in 1960 and 1961, the plaintiff filed a third-party suit in August 1961, more than six months after the award. The defendants moved for summary judgment, arguing the cause of action was assigned to the employer under 33 U.S.C.A. § 933(b) due to the delayed filing. The plaintiff contended that he could still sue if there was a conflict of interest with his employer or insurer. The Court, interpreting Section 933(b) in light of its legislative history and purpose, ruled that a longshoreman's cause of action is assigned to the employer by operation of law if a third-party suit is not filed within six months of a compensation award, precluding the longshoreman from suing thereafter. The Court granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment and dismissed the case.

McClendon v. Charente Steamship Co. is a workers' compensation case decided in District Court, S.D. Texas. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in District Court, S.D. Texas.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The plaintiff, a longshoreman, sustained personal injuries in 1959 and received compensation under the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act. After formal awards in 1960 and 1961, the plaintiff filed a third-party suit in August 1961, more than six months after the award. The defendants moved for summary judgment, arguing the cause of action was assigned to the employer under 33 U.S.C.A. § 933(b) due to the delayed filing. The plaintiff contended that he could still sue if there was a conflict of interest with his employer or insurer. The Court, interpreting Section 933(b) in light of its legislative history and purpose, ruled that a longshoreman's cause of action is assigned to the employer by operation of law if a third-party suit is not filed within six months of a compensation award, precluding the longshoreman from suing thereafter. The Court granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment and dismissed the case.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

McClendon v. Charente Steamship Co. workers compensation case in District Court, S.D. Texas. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

McClendon v. Charente Steamship Co. case law summary from District Court, S.D. Texas. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

McClendon v. Charente Steamship Co. Case Analysis

McClendon v. Charente Steamship Co. is a legal case related to workers' compensation in District Court, S.D. Texas. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.