CompFox AI Summary
The defendant sought reconsideration and removal of an order vacating submission and appointing a physician due to inadequate medical evidence. The Appeals Board denied removal, finding no irreparable harm. However, it granted reconsideration to rescind the finding of injury arising out of and in the course of employment (AOE/COE). The Board determined that substantial medical evidence was lacking to support the AOE/COE finding and returned the matter to the trial level for further proceedings.
MAXIMINO ULTRERAS vs. COTTAGE HEALTH SYSTEMS is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The defendant sought reconsideration and removal of an order vacating submission and appointing a physician due to inadequate medical evidence. The Appeals Board denied removal, finding no irreparable harm. However, it granted reconsideration to rescind the finding of injury arising out of and in the course of employment (AOE/COE). The Board determined that substantial medical evidence was lacking to support the AOE/COE finding and returned the matter to the trial level for further proceedings.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.