CompFox AI Summary
Applicant sought reconsideration to be relieved of a stipulation regarding the start date for permanent disability indemnity increases, arguing a subsequent panel decision justified it. The Board denied applicant's petition, holding that a change in legal interpretation post-stipulation does not constitute good cause to set aside negotiated agreements. The Board granted defendant's petition to correct a clerical error in the attorney's fee amount, amending it from $113,451.03 to $111,029.13. The original Findings and Award were otherwise affirmed.
MAXIMILIANO RAMIREZ vs. MB BUILDING CONTRACTORS, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND INSURED RIVERSIDE is a workers' compensation case decided in . This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in .
Full Decision Text1 Pages
Applicant sought reconsideration to be relieved of a stipulation regarding the start date for permanent disability indemnity increases, arguing a subsequent panel decision justified it. The Board denied applicant's petition, holding that a change in legal interpretation post-stipulation does not constitute good cause to set aside negotiated agreements. The Board granted defendant's petition to correct a clerical error in the attorney's fee amount, amending it from $113,451.03 to $111,029.13. The original Findings and Award were otherwise affirmed.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.