Home/Case Law/Mauricio Zamudio vs. CITY OF LOS ANGELES
Regular DecisionReconsideration

Mauricio Zamudio vs. CITY OF LOS ANGELES

Filed: Feb 07, 2020
Van Nuys
ADJ11728953

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's petition for reconsideration. The applicant sought compensation for a psychiatric injury, but the WCJ found it was substantially caused by lawful, nondiscriminatory, good-faith personnel actions. The Board agreed that the applicant's demotion was a routine and reasonable employment event, thus barring compensation under Labor Code Section 3208.3(h). The applicant's injury was industrial, but the employer successfully demonstrated the exception applied.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's petition for reconsideration. The applicant sought compensation for a psychiatric injury, but the WCJ found it was substantially caused by lawful, nondiscriminatory, good-faith personnel actions. The Board agreed that the applicant's demotion was a routine and reasonable employment event, thus barring compensation under Labor Code Section 3208.3(h). The applicant's injury was industrial, but the employer successfully demonstrated the exception applied.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.