Home/Case Law/MAURICE WILLIAMS vs. JACKSONVILLE JAGUARS, USF&G, ACE INSURANCE
Regular DecisionWorkers' Compensation

MAURICE WILLIAMS vs. JACKSONVILLE JAGUARS, USF&G, ACE INSURANCE

Filed: Mar 07, 2013
ADJ7672393

CompFox AI Summary

This case concerns Maurice Williams, a former professional football player for the Jacksonville Jaguars, who sought workers' compensation benefits in California for a cumulative injury sustained between 2001 and 2009. While a portion of his employment exposed him to California, his contracts from 2007-2011 contained a mandatory forum selection clause requiring all injury claims to be resolved in Florida under Florida law. The Board affirmed the trial judge's decision to decline jurisdiction, finding the forum selection clause to be reasonable and binding for the latter portion of the cumulative injury period. Enforcement of the clause was not deemed unreasonable or unjust, and the applicant failed to demonstrate why California jurisdiction should be exercised despite the contractual agreement.

MAURICE WILLIAMS vs. JACKSONVILLE JAGUARS, USF&G, ACE INSURANCE is a workers' compensation case decided in . This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in .

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case concerns Maurice Williams, a former professional football player for the Jacksonville Jaguars, who sought workers' compensation benefits in California for a cumulative injury sustained between 2001 and 2009. While a portion of his employment exposed him to California, his contracts from 2007-2011 contained a mandatory forum selection clause requiring all injury claims to be resolved in Florida under Florida law. The Board affirmed the trial judge's decision to decline jurisdiction, finding the forum selection clause to be reasonable and binding for the latter portion of the cumulative injury period. Enforcement of the clause was not deemed unreasonable or unjust, and the applicant failed to demonstrate why California jurisdiction should be exercised despite the contractual agreement.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

MAURICE WILLIAMS vs. JACKSONVILLE JAGUARS, USF&G, ACE INSURANCE workers compensation case in . Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

MAURICE WILLIAMS vs. JACKSONVILLE JAGUARS, USF&G, ACE INSURANCE case law summary from . Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

MAURICE WILLIAMS vs. JACKSONVILLE JAGUARS, USF&G, ACE INSURANCE Case Analysis

MAURICE WILLIAMS vs. JACKSONVILLE JAGUARS, USF&G, ACE INSURANCE is a legal case related to workers' compensation in . This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.