CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's petition for reconsideration. The Board affirmed the finding that the applicant sustained industrial injury during two cumulative trauma periods, including one ending around May 12, 2000. The defendant argued this earlier period was barred by the statute of limitations. However, the Board found the applicant was not penalized for relying on her supervisor's assurance that her health insurance would cover the injury, thus tolling the statute.
MAUREEN FAREY vs. NOVATO COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, Permissibly Self-Insured, Adjusted By SUTTER HEALTH WORKERS' COMPENSATION is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's petition for reconsideration. The Board affirmed the finding that the applicant sustained industrial injury during two cumulative trauma periods, including one ending around May 12, 2000. The defendant argued this earlier period was barred by the statute of limitations. However, the Board found the applicant was not penalized for relying on her supervisor's assurance that her health insurance would cover the injury, thus tolling the statute.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.