CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed Mary Jane Rhodes' petition for reconsideration as untimely and successive. The petition was filed over three years after the Board's August 29, 2007 order denying a previous reconsideration. California law requires petitions for reconsideration to be filed within twenty days of service of a final order. Since the applicant had already filed a prior petition on the same issue after failing to prevail, a subsequent petition was impermissible.
MARY JANE RHODES vs. THE STANLEY WORKS FASTENING PERMISSIBLY SELF-INSURED AND ADJUSTED BY CONSTITUTION STATE SERVICES is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed Mary Jane Rhodes' petition for reconsideration as untimely and successive. The petition was filed over three years after the Board's August 29, 2007 order denying a previous reconsideration. California law requires petitions for reconsideration to be filed within twenty days of service of a final order. Since the applicant had already filed a prior petition on the same issue after failing to prevail, a subsequent petition was impermissible.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.