Home/Case Law/MARY HAIRSTON vs. ATRIA MENIFEE VALLEY, GALLAGHER BASSETT
Regular DecisionReconsideration

MARY HAIRSTON vs. ATRIA MENIFEE VALLEY, GALLAGHER BASSETT

Filed: Nov 27, 2019
Riverside
ADJ11426117

CompFox AI Summary

The Applicant sought reconsideration of an approved Compromise and Release, alleging denial of due process due to her attorney's absence when signing and misunderstanding its nature. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the Petition for Reconsideration as premature. The WCAB agreed with the judge that the Applicant's due process concerns require a hearing at the trial level to present evidence regarding setting aside the settlement. Any party aggrieved by a subsequent trial level decision can then properly seek reconsideration.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Applicant sought reconsideration of an approved Compromise and Release, alleging denial of due process due to her attorney's absence when signing and misunderstanding its nature. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the Petition for Reconsideration as premature. The WCAB agreed with the judge that the Applicant's due process concerns require a hearing at the trial level to present evidence regarding setting aside the settlement. Any party aggrieved by a subsequent trial level decision can then properly seek reconsideration.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

MARY HAIRSTON vs. ATRIA MENIFEE VALLEY, GALLAGHER BASSETT (2019) – Riverside | CompFox