Home/Case Law/MARY CRUZ PATINO vs. ARAMARK AT HP PAVILION, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

MARY CRUZ PATINO vs. ARAMARK AT HP PAVILION, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES

Filed: Apr 29, 2014
San Jose
ADJ7630420

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the applicant's petition for reconsideration because it was untimely filed. The Board also denied the defendant's petition for reconsideration. The Court adopted the findings of the administrative law judge's report and recommendation in both instances.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the applicant's petition for reconsideration because it was untimely filed. The Board also denied the defendant's petition for reconsideration. The Court adopted the findings of the administrative law judge's report and recommendation in both instances.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

MARY CRUZ PATINO vs. ARAMARK AT HP PAVILION, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES (2014) – San Jose | CompFox