CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the applicant's petition for reconsideration because it was untimely filed. The Board also denied the defendant's petition for reconsideration. The Court adopted the findings of the administrative law judge's report and recommendation in both instances.
MARY CRUZ PATINO vs. ARAMARK AT HP PAVILION, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES is a workers' compensation case decided in San Jose. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Jose.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the applicant's petition for reconsideration because it was untimely filed. The Board also denied the defendant's petition for reconsideration. The Court adopted the findings of the administrative law judge's report and recommendation in both instances.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.