Home/Case Law/MARY AUSTIN vs. AUORA ELECTRONICS, INC., ST. PAUL, TRAVELERS
Regular DecisionReconsideration

MARY AUSTIN vs. AUORA ELECTRONICS, INC., ST. PAUL, TRAVELERS

Filed: Jan 06, 2009
San Francisco
ADJ1455157 (MON 0252659)

CompFox AI Summary

The WCJ's decision is justified by the evidence. The 2005 PDRS should not have been applied. Medical evidence justifies a finding of permanent and total disability. Defendant failed to prove apportionment.

MARY AUSTIN vs. AUORA ELECTRONICS, INC., ST. PAUL, TRAVELERS is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The WCJ's decision is justified by the evidence. The 2005 PDRS should not have been applied. Medical evidence justifies a finding of permanent and total disability. Defendant failed to prove apportionment.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

MARY AUSTIN vs. AUORA ELECTRONICS, INC., ST. PAUL, TRAVELERS workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

MARY AUSTIN vs. AUORA ELECTRONICS, INC., ST. PAUL, TRAVELERS case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

MARY AUSTIN vs. AUORA ELECTRONICS, INC., ST. PAUL, TRAVELERS Case Analysis

MARY AUSTIN vs. AUORA ELECTRONICS, INC., ST. PAUL, TRAVELERS is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.