CompFox AI Summary
The applicant sought reconsideration of an order that continued her case to a Mandatory Settlement Conference and further trial, arguing procedural errors by the Workers' Compensation Judge (WCJ). The Board dismissed the petition for reconsideration, finding the order was procedural and not a final determination. Removal was also denied as the applicant failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm. The Board affirmed the WCJ's authority to develop the record and acknowledged the case's protracted history.
MARY ANN HEALY vs. ZAKS, HEALY & OWENSBY; KEMPER INSURANCE, Adjusted By BROADSPIRE is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The applicant sought reconsideration of an order that continued her case to a Mandatory Settlement Conference and further trial, arguing procedural errors by the Workers' Compensation Judge (WCJ). The Board dismissed the petition for reconsideration, finding the order was procedural and not a final determination. Removal was also denied as the applicant failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm. The Board affirmed the WCJ's authority to develop the record and acknowledged the case's protracted history.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.