CompFox AI Summary
The Defendant sought to rescind a stipulated workers' compensation award, alleging mutual mistake of fact regarding the applicant's return-to-work date and clerical errors in the permanent disability indemnity calculation. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the award, and returned the matter to the trial level for further proceedings. This action was taken because the applicant's concurrence in rescission was unknown and the record was unclear regarding the alleged errors.
MARVIN IRVIN vs. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, TRISTAR RISK MANAGEMENT is a workers' compensation case decided in . This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in .
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Defendant sought to rescind a stipulated workers' compensation award, alleging mutual mistake of fact regarding the applicant's return-to-work date and clerical errors in the permanent disability indemnity calculation. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the award, and returned the matter to the trial level for further proceedings. This action was taken because the applicant's concurrence in rescission was unknown and the record was unclear regarding the alleged errors.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.