Home/Case Law/MARTINA IRAHETA vs. BAL SEAL ENGINEERING, INC., APPLIED RISK SERVICES, INC.
Regular DecisionReconsideration

MARTINA IRAHETA vs. BAL SEAL ENGINEERING, INC., APPLIED RISK SERVICES, INC.

Filed: Jan 15, 2013
Santa Ana
ADJ7689152

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's petition for reconsideration. The Board adopted the Administrative Law Judge's (ALJ) report, which found the applicant's exhibits inadmissible due to failure to meet service deadlines and inadequate medical reporting by Dr. Black. The ALJ also found the applicant's testimony not credible, failing to establish a prima facie case for injury. Therefore, the petition for reconsideration was denied.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's petition for reconsideration. The Board adopted the Administrative Law Judge's (ALJ) report, which found the applicant's exhibits inadmissible due to failure to meet service deadlines and inadequate medical reporting by Dr. Black. The ALJ also found the applicant's testimony not credible, failing to establish a prima facie case for injury. Therefore, the petition for reconsideration was denied.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

MARTINA IRAHETA vs. BAL SEAL ENGINEERING, INC., APPLIED RISK SERVICES, INC. (2013) – Santa Ana | CompFox