Home/Case Law/MARTIN CERVANTES vs. KIRKHILL-TA, ESIS, INC.
Regular DecisionReconsideration

MARTIN CERVANTES vs. KIRKHILL-TA, ESIS, INC.

Filed: Jul 02, 2008
San Francisco
ADJ1983740

CompFox AI Summary

The Appeals Board denied reconsideration of a WCJ's decision denying benefits due to lack of employer notice of injury before termination. Conflicting testimony existed regarding whether the applicant had notified his employer.

MARTIN CERVANTES vs. KIRKHILL-TA, ESIS, INC. is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Appeals Board denied reconsideration of a WCJ's decision denying benefits due to lack of employer notice of injury before termination. Conflicting testimony existed regarding whether the applicant had notified his employer.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

MARTIN CERVANTES vs. KIRKHILL-TA, ESIS, INC. workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

MARTIN CERVANTES vs. KIRKHILL-TA, ESIS, INC. case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

MARTIN CERVANTES vs. KIRKHILL-TA, ESIS, INC. Case Analysis

MARTIN CERVANTES vs. KIRKHILL-TA, ESIS, INC. is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.