Home/Case Law/MARTIN CASILLAS vs. JOSE TALAVERA, EUSEBIO VALLES SANCHEZ JR., LAS LOMAS INVESTMENTS LLC, BABAK MOHAMMADI, FOREMOST INSURANCE COMPANY
Regular DecisionPetition for Reconsideration Dismissal

MARTIN CASILLAS vs. JOSE TALAVERA, EUSEBIO VALLES SANCHEZ JR., LAS LOMAS INVESTMENTS LLC, BABAK MOHAMMADI, FOREMOST INSURANCE COMPANY

Filed: Feb 06, 2023
Van Nuys
ADJ12391409

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed a Petition for Reconsideration filed by Las Lomas Investments, LLC, and Babak Mohammadi. The Board found the petition was not taken from a "final" order, as it contested a procedural order continuing the trial. Furthermore, the Board ruled that the issue of being prima facie illegally uninsured must first be addressed at the trial level with the admission of evidence. Therefore, the petition was dismissed because it sought reconsideration of an interlocutory order and the substantive issue was not ripe for appeal.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed a Petition for Reconsideration filed by Las Lomas Investments, LLC, and Babak Mohammadi. The Board found the petition was not taken from a "final" order, as it contested a procedural order continuing the trial. Furthermore, the Board ruled that the issue of being prima facie illegally uninsured must first be addressed at the trial level with the admission of evidence. Therefore, the petition was dismissed because it sought reconsideration of an interlocutory order and the substantive issue was not ripe for appeal.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

MARTIN CASILLAS vs. JOSE TALAVERA, EUSEBIO VALLES SANCHEZ JR., LAS LOMAS INVESTMENTS LLC, BABAK MOHAMMADI, FOREMOST INSURANCE COMPANY (2023) – Van Nuys | CompFox