CompFox AI Summary
The Appeals Board rescinded the prior award, finding applicant was temporarily disabled through May 13, 2015. While Nordstrom denied authorization for surgery, and the IMR upheld this denial, the Board found this did not preclude temporary disability payments for self-procured treatment. The Board determined that the prior finding of permanent and stationary status was premature and remanded the case to develop the record regarding post-surgical temporary disability. Nordstrom's liability for temporary disability is separate from its obligation to authorize medical treatment.
MARLA HARRIS vs. NORDSTROM, INC. is a workers' compensation case decided in San Diego. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Diego.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Appeals Board rescinded the prior award, finding applicant was temporarily disabled through May 13, 2015. While Nordstrom denied authorization for surgery, and the IMR upheld this denial, the Board found this did not preclude temporary disability payments for self-procured treatment. The Board determined that the prior finding of permanent and stationary status was premature and remanded the case to develop the record regarding post-surgical temporary disability. Nordstrom's liability for temporary disability is separate from its obligation to authorize medical treatment.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.