CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's petition for reconsideration, upholding the Administrative Law Judge's (ALJ) findings that the applicant sustained industrial injuries to his back and was awarded 17% permanent disability. The applicant argued the ALJ erred by relying on the Qualified Medical Evaluator (QME), Dr. Lane, over his treating physician. The Board found the ALJ's discretion in choosing the QME's report as substantial evidence, including apportionment of disability, was valid. However, Commissioner Sweeney dissented, arguing Dr. Lane's opinion on apportioning disability to non-industrial causes lacked substantial evidence as it was based on speculation.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's petition for reconsideration, upholding the Administrative Law Judge's (ALJ) findings that the applicant sustained industrial injuries to his back and was awarded 17% permanent disability. The applicant argued the ALJ erred by relying on the Qualified Medical Evaluator (QME), Dr. Lane, over his treating physician. The Board found the ALJ's discretion in choosing the QME's report as substantial evidence, including apportionment of disability, was valid. However, Commissioner Sweeney dissented, arguing Dr. Lane's opinion on apportioning disability to non-industrial causes lacked substantial evidence as it was based on speculation.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.