CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration, affirming that the defendant unreasonably delayed providing a job displacement voucher, entitling the applicant to a penalty. While the Board upheld the award of attorney's fees for enforcing the payment, they modified the penalty calculation. The 25% penalty will now be calculated against the actual amount of the voucher used by the applicant, not its potential maximum value.
MARK STONEBRAKER vs. MASTER COOLING CORPORATION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a workers' compensation case decided in . This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in .
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration, affirming that the defendant unreasonably delayed providing a job displacement voucher, entitling the applicant to a penalty. While the Board upheld the award of attorney's fees for enforcing the payment, they modified the penalty calculation. The 25% penalty will now be calculated against the actual amount of the voucher used by the applicant, not its potential maximum value.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.