Home/Case Law/MARK SOLJACK vs. WASTE MANAGEMENT OF ALAMEDA COUNTY, CIGA, FOR SUPERIOR NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, INSOLENT, BY AND Through ITS ADJUSTING AGENCY BROADSPIRE CLAIMS SERVICES, ACE AMERICAN INSSURANCE COMPANY, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES, INC
Regular DecisionReconsideration

MARK SOLJACK vs. WASTE MANAGEMENT OF ALAMEDA COUNTY, CIGA, FOR SUPERIOR NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, INSOLENT, BY AND Through ITS ADJUSTING AGENCY BROADSPIRE CLAIMS SERVICES, ACE AMERICAN INSSURANCE COMPANY, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES, INC

Filed: Jul 11, 2017
San Francisco
ADJ2675803 (OAK 0254082) ADJ4610228 (OAK 0130377)

CompFox AI Summary

This order dismisses the petition for reconsideration because the appealed order was procedural and interlocutory, not a final order that determined substantive rights or liabilities. The Board cites precedent defining final orders as those resolving substantive issues. Reconsideration is only available for final decisions. Furthermore, the petition for removal was denied as the applicant failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm.

MARK SOLJACK vs. WASTE MANAGEMENT OF ALAMEDA COUNTY, CIGA, FOR SUPERIOR NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, INSOLENT, BY AND Through ITS ADJUSTING AGENCY BROADSPIRE CLAIMS SERVICES, ACE AMERICAN INSSURANCE COMPANY, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES, INC is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This order dismisses the petition for reconsideration because the appealed order was procedural and interlocutory, not a final order that determined substantive rights or liabilities. The Board cites precedent defining final orders as those resolving substantive issues. Reconsideration is only available for final decisions. Furthermore, the petition for removal was denied as the applicant failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

MARK SOLJACK vs. WASTE MANAGEMENT OF ALAMEDA COUNTY, CIGA, FOR SUPERIOR NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, INSOLENT, BY AND Through ITS ADJUSTING AGENCY BROADSPIRE CLAIMS SERVICES, ACE AMERICAN INSSURANCE COMPANY, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES, INC workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

MARK SOLJACK vs. WASTE MANAGEMENT OF ALAMEDA COUNTY, CIGA, FOR SUPERIOR NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, INSOLENT, BY AND Through ITS ADJUSTING AGENCY BROADSPIRE CLAIMS SERVICES, ACE AMERICAN INSSURANCE COMPANY, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES, INC case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

MARK SOLJACK vs. WASTE MANAGEMENT OF ALAMEDA COUNTY, CIGA, FOR SUPERIOR NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, INSOLENT, BY AND Through ITS ADJUSTING AGENCY BROADSPIRE CLAIMS SERVICES, ACE AMERICAN INSSURANCE COMPANY, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES, INC Case Analysis

MARK SOLJACK vs. WASTE MANAGEMENT OF ALAMEDA COUNTY, CIGA, FOR SUPERIOR NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, INSOLENT, BY AND Through ITS ADJUSTING AGENCY BROADSPIRE CLAIMS SERVICES, ACE AMERICAN INSSURANCE COMPANY, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES, INC is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

MARK SOLJACK vs. WASTE MANAGEMENT OF ALAMEDA COUNTY, CIGA, FOR SUPERIOR NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, INSOLENT, BY AND Through ITS ADJUSTING AGENCY BROADSPIRE CLAIMS SERVICES, ACE AMERICAN INSSURANCE COMPANY, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES, INC (2017) – San Francisco | CompFox | CompFox