Home/Case Law/MARK PAYNE vs. MBC CONSTRUCTION, REDWOOD FIRE \& CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Regular DecisionReconsideration

MARK PAYNE vs. MBC CONSTRUCTION, REDWOOD FIRE \& CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

Filed: Feb 16, 2016
San Francisco
ADJ2224397 (ANA 0397221)

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and rescinded the original award. This was due to procedural errors, including the WCJ's failure to properly memorialize admitted evidence and stipulations. The applicant, unrepresented, was also denied the opportunity to present witnesses. The case is remanded for further proceedings, including a mandatory settlement conference and trial, to ensure a proper hearing record and decision. The Board emphasized adherence to procedures even for unrepresented claimants and encouraged seeking assistance from the Information and Assistance officer.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and rescinded the original award. This was due to procedural errors, including the WCJ's failure to properly memorialize admitted evidence and stipulations. The applicant, unrepresented, was also denied the opportunity to present witnesses. The case is remanded for further proceedings, including a mandatory settlement conference and trial, to ensure a proper hearing record and decision. The Board emphasized adherence to procedures even for unrepresented claimants and encouraged seeking assistance from the Information and Assistance officer.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

MARK PAYNE vs. MBC CONSTRUCTION, REDWOOD FIRE \& CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY (2016) – San Francisco | CompFox