Home/Case Law/MARK DREHER vs. ALLIANCE RESIDENTIAL, TRAVELERS CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

MARK DREHER vs. ALLIANCE RESIDENTIAL, TRAVELERS CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY

Filed: Sep 08, 2015
Santa Rosa
ADJ7050835

CompFox AI Summary

This case involves an applicant's claim for workers' compensation benefits following an injury sustained while employed as a live-in maintenance supervisor. The central dispute concerns whether the applicant's psychiatric injury claim is barred by Labor Code section 3208.3(d), which typically requires six months of employment unless the injury resulted from a sudden and extraordinary condition. The Appeals Board denied the defendant's petition for reconsideration, affirming its prior decision to amend the finding of injury to include the psyche, provided it was caused by a sudden and extraordinary condition, and deferred findings on permanent disability and attorney's fees pending further record development. The Board found the defendant's petition premature regarding these deferred issues and lacking grounds for removal.

MARK DREHER vs. ALLIANCE RESIDENTIAL, TRAVELERS CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY is a workers' compensation case decided in Santa Rosa. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Santa Rosa.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case involves an applicant's claim for workers' compensation benefits following an injury sustained while employed as a live-in maintenance supervisor. The central dispute concerns whether the applicant's psychiatric injury claim is barred by Labor Code section 3208.3(d), which typically requires six months of employment unless the injury resulted from a sudden and extraordinary condition. The Appeals Board denied the defendant's petition for reconsideration, affirming its prior decision to amend the finding of injury to include the psyche, provided it was caused by a sudden and extraordinary condition, and deferred findings on permanent disability and attorney's fees pending further record development. The Board found the defendant's petition premature regarding these deferred issues and lacking grounds for removal.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

MARK DREHER vs. ALLIANCE RESIDENTIAL, TRAVELERS CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY workers compensation case in Santa Rosa. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

MARK DREHER vs. ALLIANCE RESIDENTIAL, TRAVELERS CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY case law summary from Santa Rosa. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

MARK DREHER vs. ALLIANCE RESIDENTIAL, TRAVELERS CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY Case Analysis

MARK DREHER vs. ALLIANCE RESIDENTIAL, TRAVELERS CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Santa Rosa. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.