Home/Case Law/MARK CRONIN vs. CITY OF LOS ANGELES
Regular DecisionReconsideration

MARK CRONIN vs. CITY OF LOS ANGELES

Filed: Jun 20, 2016
Van Nuys
ADJ10061866

CompFox AI Summary

Here's a summary of the case for a lawyer:

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of a decision finding a late Independent Medical Review (IMR) determination valid. The Board ruled that timeframes for IMR issuance are directory, not mandatory, and a late IMR does not invalidate the determination. Therefore, the applicant cannot object to the IMR's timeliness after it has been issued. The Board followed precedent holding that untimeliness of an IMR does not invalidate it, thus an objection on that basis is waived.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Here's a summary of the case for a lawyer:

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of a decision finding a late Independent Medical Review (IMR) determination valid. The Board ruled that timeframes for IMR issuance are directory, not mandatory, and a late IMR does not invalidate the determination. Therefore, the applicant cannot object to the IMR's timeliness after it has been issued. The Board followed precedent holding that untimeliness of an IMR does not invalidate it, thus an objection on that basis is waived.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

MARK CRONIN vs. CITY OF LOS ANGELES (2016) – Van Nuys | CompFox