Home/Case Law/MARK COLLINS vs. ENTERTAINMENT PARTNERS, INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Regular DecisionWorkers' Compensation

MARK COLLINS vs. ENTERTAINMENT PARTNERS, INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA

Filed: Mar 19, 2018
Van Nuys
ADJ6820630

CompFox AI Summary

The WCAB dismissed the Defendant's Petition for Reconsideration because it was not filed from a final order. The Board granted the Defendant's Petition for Removal to rescind the WCJ's order vacating submission and appointing a new physician. The WCJ erred by refusing to accept the AME's rating based on the Diagnosis-Related Estimate (DRE) method, as physicians have discretion to use the most accurate method. However, the AME's own deposition testimony indicated that the Range of Motion (ROM) method, mandated by the WCJ, would yield a higher impairment rating. Therefore, the matter is returned to the trial level for the WCJ to obtain a permanent disability rating using the existing record and potentially consulting a DEU rater.

MARK COLLINS vs. ENTERTAINMENT PARTNERS, INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA is a workers' compensation case decided in Van Nuys. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Van Nuys.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The WCAB dismissed the Defendant's Petition for Reconsideration because it was not filed from a final order. The Board granted the Defendant's Petition for Removal to rescind the WCJ's order vacating submission and appointing a new physician. The WCJ erred by refusing to accept the AME's rating based on the Diagnosis-Related Estimate (DRE) method, as physicians have discretion to use the most accurate method. However, the AME's own deposition testimony indicated that the Range of Motion (ROM) method, mandated by the WCJ, would yield a higher impairment rating. Therefore, the matter is returned to the trial level for the WCJ to obtain a permanent disability rating using the existing record and potentially consulting a DEU rater.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

MARK COLLINS vs. ENTERTAINMENT PARTNERS, INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA workers compensation case in Van Nuys. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

MARK COLLINS vs. ENTERTAINMENT PARTNERS, INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA case law summary from Van Nuys. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

MARK COLLINS vs. ENTERTAINMENT PARTNERS, INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA Case Analysis

MARK COLLINS vs. ENTERTAINMENT PARTNERS, INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Van Nuys. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.