Home/Case Law/MARIO MANRIQUEZ, JR. vs. JAMES LINEBACK M.D., STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND; BREDFELDT, CORSON & ODUKOYA; and FARMINGTON CASUALTY
Regular DecisionRemoval

MARIO MANRIQUEZ, JR. vs. JAMES LINEBACK M.D., STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND; BREDFELDT, CORSON & ODUKOYA; and FARMINGTON CASUALTY

Filed: Jul 28, 2011
San Francisco
ADJ2574910 (ANA 0328189) ADJ7188791

CompFox AI Summary

The applicant, Mario Manriquez, Jr., filed a Petition for Removal seeking authorization for medical-legal testing from Farmington Casualty. The Appeals Board denied this petition, finding it premature as the applicant should have filed a Declaration of Readiness. However, the Board granted removal on its own motion to address multiple outstanding issues across two case numbers. These include the applicant's entitlement to medical treatment, the pending petition for an order compelling authorization for medical-legal expenses, and the applicant's prior no-shows at hearings. The Board redesignated the upcoming hearing as a status conference to allow the WCJ to address these matters.

MARIO MANRIQUEZ, JR. vs. JAMES LINEBACK M.D., STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND; BREDFELDT, CORSON & ODUKOYA; and FARMINGTON CASUALTY is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The applicant, Mario Manriquez, Jr., filed a Petition for Removal seeking authorization for medical-legal testing from Farmington Casualty. The Appeals Board denied this petition, finding it premature as the applicant should have filed a Declaration of Readiness. However, the Board granted removal on its own motion to address multiple outstanding issues across two case numbers. These include the applicant's entitlement to medical treatment, the pending petition for an order compelling authorization for medical-legal expenses, and the applicant's prior no-shows at hearings. The Board redesignated the upcoming hearing as a status conference to allow the WCJ to address these matters.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

MARIO MANRIQUEZ, JR. vs. JAMES LINEBACK M.D., STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND; BREDFELDT, CORSON & ODUKOYA; and FARMINGTON CASUALTY workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

MARIO MANRIQUEZ, JR. vs. JAMES LINEBACK M.D., STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND; BREDFELDT, CORSON & ODUKOYA; and FARMINGTON CASUALTY case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

MARIO MANRIQUEZ, JR. vs. JAMES LINEBACK M.D., STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND; BREDFELDT, CORSON & ODUKOYA; and FARMINGTON CASUALTY Case Analysis

MARIO MANRIQUEZ, JR. vs. JAMES LINEBACK M.D., STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND; BREDFELDT, CORSON & ODUKOYA; and FARMINGTON CASUALTY is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.