Home/Case Law/MARIO INTROINI vs. EIU OF CALIFORNIA, THE INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, CHARTIS CLAIMS, INC.
Regular Decision

MARIO INTROINI vs. EIU OF CALIFORNIA, THE INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, CHARTIS CLAIMS, INC.

Filed: Jul 24, 2013
Bakersfield
ADJ8081691

CompFox AI Summary

This Workers' Compensation Appeals Board case dismissed a Petition for Reconsideration as untimely because it was filed more than 25 days after the decision date, exceeding the statutory limit. The petition was also dismissed for failing to be verified as required by Labor Code section 5902. Even if timely and verified, the Board would have denied the petition on the merits. The dismissal is based on both procedural defects and the WCJ's recommendation.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This Workers' Compensation Appeals Board case dismissed a Petition for Reconsideration as untimely because it was filed more than 25 days after the decision date, exceeding the statutory limit. The petition was also dismissed for failing to be verified as required by Labor Code section 5902. Even if timely and verified, the Board would have denied the petition on the merits. The dismissal is based on both procedural defects and the WCJ's recommendation.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

MARIO INTROINI vs. EIU OF CALIFORNIA, THE INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, CHARTIS CLAIMS, INC. (2013) – Bakersfield | CompFox