Home/Case Law/MARIO GONZALEZ vs. STANLEY VANDERVEEN/VMV HULLING LLC, et al.
Regular DecisionWorkers' Compensation

MARIO GONZALEZ vs. STANLEY VANDERVEEN/VMV HULLING LLC, et al.

Filed: Jul 02, 2010
San Francisco
ADJ3005224 (STK 0185309)

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of an applicant's petition. The applicant sought to establish employment with various entities or individuals after sustaining injuries from falling off a tractor. The Board adopted the Workers' Compensation Judge's report, which found the applicant's testimony to be not credible and lacked substantial evidence of employment. The judge found the testimony of Stanley Vanderveen and David Corona to be more credible.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of an applicant's petition. The applicant sought to establish employment with various entities or individuals after sustaining injuries from falling off a tractor. The Board adopted the Workers' Compensation Judge's report, which found the applicant's testimony to be not credible and lacked substantial evidence of employment. The judge found the testimony of Stanley Vanderveen and David Corona to be more credible.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

MARIO GONZALEZ vs. STANLEY VANDERVEEN/VMV HULLING LLC, et al. (2010) – San Francisco | CompFox