Home/Case Law/Marina Espericueta vs. SAS SAFETY CORPORATION, THE HARTFORD
Regular DecisionReconsideration

Marina Espericueta vs. SAS SAFETY CORPORATION, THE HARTFORD

Filed: Feb 05, 2015
Santa Ana
ADJ8623408

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's petition for reconsideration. The Board adopted the findings of the administrative law judge, concluding there was no substantial medical evidence of an industrial injury. Furthermore, the applicant's claim was barred by the post-termination rule (Labor Code § 3600(a)(10)) as she failed to prove employer notice of injury prior to layoff. The denial of the claim was also found to be timely.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's petition for reconsideration. The Board adopted the findings of the administrative law judge, concluding there was no substantial medical evidence of an industrial injury. Furthermore, the applicant's claim was barred by the post-termination rule (Labor Code § 3600(a)(10)) as she failed to prove employer notice of injury prior to layoff. The denial of the claim was also found to be timely.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

Marina Espericueta vs. SAS SAFETY CORPORATION, THE HARTFORD (2015) – Santa Ana | CompFox