CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed Marilyn Kinman's petition for reconsideration against Aetna and Hartford Insurance Company. The Board found the petition to be untimely, skeletal, and lacking specific grounds for reconsideration. Furthermore, the applicant's attorney failed to adequately explain why new evidence regarding stale medical reports could not have been presented earlier, despite ample opportunity for discovery over five years. Consequently, the Board adopted the WCJ's report and formally dismissed the petition.
MARILYN KINMAN vs. AETNA, INC.; HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed Marilyn Kinman's petition for reconsideration against Aetna and Hartford Insurance Company. The Board found the petition to be untimely, skeletal, and lacking specific grounds for reconsideration. Furthermore, the applicant's attorney failed to adequately explain why new evidence regarding stale medical reports could not have been presented earlier, despite ample opportunity for discovery over five years. Consequently, the Board adopted the WCJ's report and formally dismissed the petition.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.