CompFox AI Summary
The applicant sought reconsideration of a WCJ's finding that the Appeals Board lacked jurisdiction over medical treatment reasonableness due to a timely utilization review (UR) determination. The applicant argued the UR decision was untimely because it was not served on counsel within two days. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, finding that a UR decision, even if timely made, is invalid if not timely communicated. Therefore, the matter was returned for a new decision, requiring the WCJ to determine if the UR decision was timely communicated and to adjudicate medical necessity if it was not.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The applicant sought reconsideration of a WCJ's finding that the Appeals Board lacked jurisdiction over medical treatment reasonableness due to a timely utilization review (UR) determination. The applicant argued the UR decision was untimely because it was not served on counsel within two days. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, finding that a UR decision, even if timely made, is invalid if not timely communicated. Therefore, the matter was returned for a new decision, requiring the WCJ to determine if the UR decision was timely communicated and to adjudicate medical necessity if it was not.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.