Home/Case Law/MARICELA CASTANEDA vs. HUGHSON NUT COMPANY, MAJESTIC INSURANCE COMPANY, TECHNOLOGY COMPANY
Regular DecisionReconsideration

MARICELA CASTANEDA vs. HUGHSON NUT COMPANY, MAJESTIC INSURANCE COMPANY, TECHNOLOGY COMPANY

Stockton
ADJ7261546

CompFox AI Summary

This case concerns applicant Maricela Castaneda's petition for reconsideration of a Workers' Compensation Appeals Board decision. The applicant sought benefits for injuries to her left wrist, low back, abdomen, and psyche, but the trial judge limited the compensable injuries to the left wrist and low back. The petition argued that the medical evidence regarding permanent disability and psychological causation was insufficient. The Board denied reconsideration, adopting the WCJ's report, which found the applicant's challenges to the medical evidence lacked merit and highlighted issues with the applicant's credibility. The Board also admonished applicant's counsel for a procedural filing error.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case concerns applicant Maricela Castaneda's petition for reconsideration of a Workers' Compensation Appeals Board decision. The applicant sought benefits for injuries to her left wrist, low back, abdomen, and psyche, but the trial judge limited the compensable injuries to the left wrist and low back. The petition argued that the medical evidence regarding permanent disability and psychological causation was insufficient. The Board denied reconsideration, adopting the WCJ's report, which found the applicant's challenges to the medical evidence lacked merit and highlighted issues with the applicant's credibility. The Board also admonished applicant's counsel for a procedural filing error.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.