Home/Case Law/MARIA O'CAMPO vs. MICHAEL D. COOPER, D.D.S., INC.; STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
Regular DecisionReconsideration

MARIA O'CAMPO vs. MICHAEL D. COOPER, D.D.S., INC.; STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY

Filed: Sep 08, 2009
San Francisco
ADJ3776077 (ANA 0409837) ADJ1854171 (ANA 0409862) ADJ310640 (ANA 0409836)

CompFox AI Summary

This case involves applicant Maria O'Campo's petition for reconsideration of findings regarding industrial injuries to her knee, spine, and upper extremities. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration, affirming the WCJ's decision that applicant sustained industrial injuries but awarding only 2% permanent disability for upper extremity injuries, finding no permanent disability for the knee and spine. The WCJ properly relied on substantial medical evidence, particularly Dr. Mandel's reports, and found Dr. Einbund's report to be unreliable due to an apparent misinterpretation of an MRI. The Appeals Board found no requirement to further develop the record, as applicant failed to request it and the existing evidence supported the WCJ's findings.

MARIA O'CAMPO vs. MICHAEL D. COOPER, D.D.S., INC.; STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case involves applicant Maria O'Campo's petition for reconsideration of findings regarding industrial injuries to her knee, spine, and upper extremities. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration, affirming the WCJ's decision that applicant sustained industrial injuries but awarding only 2% permanent disability for upper extremity injuries, finding no permanent disability for the knee and spine. The WCJ properly relied on substantial medical evidence, particularly Dr. Mandel's reports, and found Dr. Einbund's report to be unreliable due to an apparent misinterpretation of an MRI. The Appeals Board found no requirement to further develop the record, as applicant failed to request it and the existing evidence supported the WCJ's findings.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

MARIA O'CAMPO vs. MICHAEL D. COOPER, D.D.S., INC.; STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

MARIA O'CAMPO vs. MICHAEL D. COOPER, D.D.S., INC.; STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

MARIA O'CAMPO vs. MICHAEL D. COOPER, D.D.S., INC.; STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY Case Analysis

MARIA O'CAMPO vs. MICHAEL D. COOPER, D.D.S., INC.; STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.