Home/Case Law/MARIA GARIBAY vs. CARL KARCHER ENTERPRISES RESTAURANTS, TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA
Regular DecisionReconsideration

MARIA GARIBAY vs. CARL KARCHER ENTERPRISES RESTAURANTS, TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA

Filed: Sep 28, 2018
Anaheim
ADJ9866898

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the Petition for Reconsideration in Maria Garibay's case. The denial was based on the finding that the parties failed to follow the mandatory procedure outlined in Labor Code section 4062.2 for obtaining a medical-legal evaluation. This statute dictates a specific process involving agreement or a QME panel selection, which was not demonstrated to have been followed in this case. Therefore, the petition was denied as the necessary procedural requirements were not met.

MARIA GARIBAY vs. CARL KARCHER ENTERPRISES RESTAURANTS, TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA is a workers' compensation case decided in Anaheim. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Anaheim.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the Petition for Reconsideration in Maria Garibay's case. The denial was based on the finding that the parties failed to follow the mandatory procedure outlined in Labor Code section 4062.2 for obtaining a medical-legal evaluation. This statute dictates a specific process involving agreement or a QME panel selection, which was not demonstrated to have been followed in this case. Therefore, the petition was denied as the necessary procedural requirements were not met.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

MARIA GARIBAY vs. CARL KARCHER ENTERPRISES RESTAURANTS, TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA workers compensation case in Anaheim. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

MARIA GARIBAY vs. CARL KARCHER ENTERPRISES RESTAURANTS, TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA case law summary from Anaheim. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

MARIA GARIBAY vs. CARL KARCHER ENTERPRISES RESTAURANTS, TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA Case Analysis

MARIA GARIBAY vs. CARL KARCHER ENTERPRISES RESTAURANTS, TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Anaheim. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.