CompFox AI Summary
This case involves a lien claimant's petition for reconsideration of a workers' compensation award. The claimant sought reimbursement for interpreter services at their claimed market rate, but the judge awarded a lower rate, finding the claimant failed to prove their market rate. The Appeals Board denied reconsideration, agreeing that the claimant did not present sufficient documentation to establish the market rate for their services. The claimant's exhibits lacked clarity on similarity of services and the selection process for presented billing and payment records.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case involves a lien claimant's petition for reconsideration of a workers' compensation award. The claimant sought reimbursement for interpreter services at their claimed market rate, but the judge awarded a lower rate, finding the claimant failed to prove their market rate. The Appeals Board denied reconsideration, agreeing that the claimant did not present sufficient documentation to establish the market rate for their services. The claimant's exhibits lacked clarity on similarity of services and the selection process for presented billing and payment records.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.