CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the applicant's petition for reconsideration because it was not filed from a "final" order that determined substantive rights or liabilities. The Board clarified that interlocutory procedural or evidentiary decisions do not qualify for reconsideration. The petition for removal was also denied, as the applicant failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm. Therefore, the petition for reconsideration was dismissed and the petition for removal was denied.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the applicant's petition for reconsideration because it was not filed from a "final" order that determined substantive rights or liabilities. The Board clarified that interlocutory procedural or evidentiary decisions do not qualify for reconsideration. The petition for removal was also denied, as the applicant failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm. Therefore, the petition for reconsideration was dismissed and the petition for removal was denied.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.