Home/Case Law/MARIA ACEVEDO vs. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP, KAISER PERMANENTE
Regular DecisionReconsideration

MARIA ACEVEDO vs. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP, KAISER PERMANENTE

Filed: Aug 14, 2017
ADJ2954707 (LAO 0811130)

CompFox AI Summary

This case involves Maria Acevedo's petition for reconsideration before the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB). The WCAB dismissed Acevedo's petition as successive because it raised the same issues as a prior petition on which she did not prevail. Established precedent dictates that a party cannot file a second petition for reconsideration unless newly aggrieved or if new evidence was considered. Since no new evidence was presented, the WCAB found the current petition impermissible and therefore dismissed it.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case involves Maria Acevedo's petition for reconsideration before the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB). The WCAB dismissed Acevedo's petition as successive because it raised the same issues as a prior petition on which she did not prevail. Established precedent dictates that a party cannot file a second petition for reconsideration unless newly aggrieved or if new evidence was considered. Since no new evidence was presented, the WCAB found the current petition impermissible and therefore dismissed it.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

MARIA ACEVEDO vs. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP, KAISER PERMANENTE (2017) – | CompFox