CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the defendant's petition for reconsideration as interlocutory procedural orders are not final and thus not subject to reconsideration. The Board also denied the defendant's petition for removal, finding no evidence of irreparable harm and that the defendant failed to provide sufficient proof to support joinder of a concurrent employer. The defendant may refile for joinder with proper supporting evidence.
MARGARET PORRAS vs. MACY'S DEPARTMENT STORES, FEDERATED CLAIMS SERVICES is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the defendant's petition for reconsideration as interlocutory procedural orders are not final and thus not subject to reconsideration. The Board also denied the defendant's petition for removal, finding no evidence of irreparable harm and that the defendant failed to provide sufficient proof to support joinder of a concurrent employer. The defendant may refile for joinder with proper supporting evidence.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.