CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board affirmed a prior decision barring applicant Marcus Robinson's claim in California. The Board found that Robinson's cumulative trauma injury, sustained over a lengthy professional football career, lacked a sufficient connection to California. Despite Robinson playing four games and practicing once in California, this exposure constituted only about 3% of his career, similar to a prior case that found such a connection de minimis. The Board clarified that while statutory jurisdiction exists, exercising it here would violate due process.
MARCUS ROBINSON vs. CHICAGO BEARS, FAIRMONT PREMIER INSURANCE COMPANY, ZENITH, TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, MINNESOTA VIKINGS, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES, BALTIMORE RAVENS is a workers' compensation case decided in Santa Ana. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Santa Ana.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board affirmed a prior decision barring applicant Marcus Robinson's claim in California. The Board found that Robinson's cumulative trauma injury, sustained over a lengthy professional football career, lacked a sufficient connection to California. Despite Robinson playing four games and practicing once in California, this exposure constituted only about 3% of his career, similar to a prior case that found such a connection de minimis. The Board clarified that while statutory jurisdiction exists, exercising it here would violate due process.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.