CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration of a prior award finding 33% permanent disability for a left wrist injury. The Board found Dr. Newman's medical opinion, upon which the award was based, lacked substantial evidence and a clear factual basis for the disability rating, particularly the analogy used. Consequently, the Board rescinded the award and returned the case to the trial level for further development of the medical record. The other contentions raised by the defendant were deferred pending the outcome of further proceedings.
MARCOS MATTA vs. NUMMI, GALLAGHER BASSETT GOLD RIVER is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration of a prior award finding 33% permanent disability for a left wrist injury. The Board found Dr. Newman's medical opinion, upon which the award was based, lacked substantial evidence and a clear factual basis for the disability rating, particularly the analogy used. Consequently, the Board rescinded the award and returned the case to the trial level for further development of the medical record. The other contentions raised by the defendant were deferred pending the outcome of further proceedings.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.