CompFox AI Summary
Applicant sought reconsideration of a prior award finding back, neck, and psyche injury, compensated temporary disability, and 50% permanent disability. His petition focused on a desire for temporary total disability for a later period, but this was not an issue in the prior proceedings and was stipulated as compensated. Furthermore, the petition untimely sought review of an earlier order terminating temporary disability, for which the reconsideration period had expired. Therefore, the Board denied reconsideration of the award and dismissed the petition regarding the termination order due to lack of jurisdiction.
MARCO DE ANDA vs. ADECCO STAFFING AND INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
Applicant sought reconsideration of a prior award finding back, neck, and psyche injury, compensated temporary disability, and 50% permanent disability. His petition focused on a desire for temporary total disability for a later period, but this was not an issue in the prior proceedings and was stipulated as compensated. Furthermore, the petition untimely sought review of an earlier order terminating temporary disability, for which the reconsideration period had expired. Therefore, the Board denied reconsideration of the award and dismissed the petition regarding the termination order due to lack of jurisdiction.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.