CompFox AI Summary
The State Compensation Insurance Fund petitioned for reconsideration of awards made to Marcelo Rueda, arguing that Agreed Medical Examiner (AME) reports by Drs. Hyman and Sanders lacked substantial evidence. Specifically, the Fund disputed impairment ratings for hypertension, upper digestive tract issues, and sleep disorders, as well as the carpal tunnel syndrome diagnosis. The judge recommended denying the petition, finding that the AME reports provided reasoned medical opinions supported by the AMA Guides and clinical judgment. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration to further review the complex factual and legal issues involved.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The State Compensation Insurance Fund petitioned for reconsideration of awards made to Marcelo Rueda, arguing that Agreed Medical Examiner (AME) reports by Drs. Hyman and Sanders lacked substantial evidence. Specifically, the Fund disputed impairment ratings for hypertension, upper digestive tract issues, and sleep disorders, as well as the carpal tunnel syndrome diagnosis. The judge recommended denying the petition, finding that the AME reports provided reasoned medical opinions supported by the AMA Guides and clinical judgment. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration to further review the complex factual and legal issues involved.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.