Home/Case Law/MANUEL SALAZAR vs. U.S. WAREHOUSE TECHNOLOGY, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE CO.
Regular Decision

MANUEL SALAZAR vs. U.S. WAREHOUSE TECHNOLOGY, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE CO.

Filed: Oct 09, 2007
San Francisco
POM 0280813

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) rescinded its previous order granting reconsideration and dismissed Emily Medina's petition. The WCAB found that Ms. Medina, an office manager for the lien claimant Vineyard Injury Center, lacked legal standing to file the petition as she was neither the legal representative nor an aggrieved party. Vineyard Injury Center had been represented by counsel throughout the proceedings regarding its lien claim.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) rescinded its previous order granting reconsideration and dismissed Emily Medina's petition. The WCAB found that Ms. Medina, an office manager for the lien claimant Vineyard Injury Center, lacked legal standing to file the petition as she was neither the legal representative nor an aggrieved party. Vineyard Injury Center had been represented by counsel throughout the proceedings regarding its lien claim.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

MANUEL SALAZAR vs. U.S. WAREHOUSE TECHNOLOGY, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE CO. (2007) – San Francisco | CompFox