CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of a decision finding the applicant an employee of Corn Maiden Foods, Inc. The defendant argued the collateral estoppel issue was not timely raised, but the Board found it was sufficiently put in issue. The Board also rejected the argument that the Labor Commissioner did not expressly rule on the employment status. The defendant's remedy was to appeal the Labor Commissioner's decision, not to re-litigate the issue.
MANUEL MILLAN vs. CORN MAIDEN FOODS, INC., UNINSURED EMPLOYERS BENEFITS TRUST FUND is a workers' compensation case decided in Los Angeles. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Los Angeles.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of a decision finding the applicant an employee of Corn Maiden Foods, Inc. The defendant argued the collateral estoppel issue was not timely raised, but the Board found it was sufficiently put in issue. The Board also rejected the argument that the Labor Commissioner did not expressly rule on the employment status. The defendant's remedy was to appeal the Labor Commissioner's decision, not to re-litigate the issue.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.