Home/Case Law/MANDANA SHOEMAKER vs. VALENCIA MEXICAN RESTAURANT INC.; TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA
Regular DecisionReconsideration

MANDANA SHOEMAKER vs. VALENCIA MEXICAN RESTAURANT INC.; TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA

Filed: Oct 06, 2020
Van Nuys
ADJ9223616

CompFox AI Summary

This case concerns an applicant's petition for reconsideration of a denial of her request to set aside a Compromise and Release (C&R) agreement. The applicant claimed she was incompetent, coerced, and defrauded when she agreed to the settlement, and that she had new and further disability. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied the petition, adopting the judge's report that found no sufficient evidence to support setting aside the C&R. The WCAB also noted potential issues with the applicant's representation by a disbarred attorney.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case concerns an applicant's petition for reconsideration of a denial of her request to set aside a Compromise and Release (C&R) agreement. The applicant claimed she was incompetent, coerced, and defrauded when she agreed to the settlement, and that she had new and further disability. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied the petition, adopting the judge's report that found no sufficient evidence to support setting aside the C&R. The WCAB also noted potential issues with the applicant's representation by a disbarred attorney.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

MANDANA SHOEMAKER vs. VALENCIA MEXICAN RESTAURANT INC.; TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA (2020) – Van Nuys | CompFox